The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Origins, Protections, and Its Role in Immigration

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, often simply referred to as the Charter, is a foundational document that enshrines the rights and freedoms of individuals in Canada. As part of the Constitution Act of 1982, the Charter plays a crucial role in defining the relationship between the state and its citizens. It is a symbol of Canadian democracy and a significant milestone in the country’s legal and political development. This article delves into the origins and evolution of the Charter, explores the key rights it protects, examines its role in Canadian society, and discusses some of the challenges and criticisms it faces.

The Origins and Evolution of the Charter

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was introduced as part of the Constitution Act, 1982, marking a pivotal moment in Canadian history. Prior to the Charter, Canada relied on the British North America Act of 1867 and the Canadian Bill of Rights of 1960 for its legal framework. However, these documents had limitations, such as the inability to fully protect individual rights against legislative infringement. The need for a more comprehensive and entrenched document led to the development of the Charter.

The process of creating the Charter involved extensive negotiations among federal and provincial governments. Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau was a key advocate for the Charter, viewing it as a means to unify the nation and protect citizens’ rights across provinces. The negotiations culminated in the signing of the Constitution Act in 1982, which included the Charter as a central component. This marked the first time Canada had complete control over its constitution, severing the final legal ties with Britain.

Since its inception, the Charter has undergone interpretation and evolution through judicial decisions. The Supreme Court of Canada has played a pivotal role in shaping the understanding of the Charter’s provisions, ensuring they adapt to changing societal values and circumstances. This dynamic interpretation allows the Charter to remain relevant and responsive to contemporary issues.

The Charter has also influenced constitutional reforms in other countries, highlighting its significance beyond Canadian borders. It has served as a model for nations seeking to establish or enhance their own human rights frameworks, showcasing Canada’s commitment to individual freedoms and democratic principles.

Key Rights Protected Under the Charter

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms outlines a broad array of rights and freedoms that are protected for all individuals within Canada. These rights are categorized into several sections, each addressing specific areas of concern. One of the fundamental rights is freedom of expression, which allows individuals to communicate their thoughts and ideas without undue interference from the government.

Another critical aspect of the Charter is the protection of legal rights, ensuring fair treatment within the justice system. This includes the right to a fair trial, protection against unreasonable search and seizure, and the right to legal counsel. These provisions safeguard individuals against potential abuses of power by the state and ensure justice is administered equitably.

Equality rights are also enshrined in the Charter, prohibiting discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, color, religion, sex, age, or mental or physical disability. These rights affirm the principle of equal treatment and opportunity for all, fostering a more inclusive society. Additionally, the Charter recognizes the multicultural heritage of Canadians, promoting the preservation and enhancement of cultural diversity.

The Charter also includes provisions for democratic rights, such as the right to vote and run for public office, as well as mobility rights, allowing individuals to live and work anywhere in Canada. These rights underpin the democratic fabric of the nation and facilitate the free movement of people within its borders, contributing to economic and social cohesion.

Application of the Charter to Individuals inside and outside Canada

It is important to note that the Charter applies differently to immigration applicants depending on whether they are inside or outside Canada. This distinction is rooted in the Charter’s scope, which explicitly protects the rights and freedoms of individuals in Canada, while its application outside the country is more limited and nuanced.

Charter Protections for Immigration Applicants Inside Canada

For immigration applicants physically present in Canada, the Charter provides robust protections. These include:

Legal Rights (Sections 7-14): Individuals in Canada are entitled to legal protections such as the right to life, liberty, and security of the person, as well as protection against arbitrary detention or imprisonment. For instance, refugee claimants or individuals challenging deportation orders can invoke these rights to argue against removal if it jeopardizes their safety or well-being.

In Singh v Minister of Employment and Immigration, 1985 CanLII 65 (SCC), [1985] 1 SCR 177, the Supreme Court of Canada held that refugee claimants physically present in Canada are entitled to the protection of Section 7 of the Charter. The Court found that the procedures for adjudicating refugee status claims under the Immigration Act, 1976 did not accord fundamental justice to the claimants and thus violated Section 7 of the Charter. The decision emphasized that the term “everyone” in Section 7 includes all individuals physically present in Canada, thereby extending its protection to refugee claimants. The Court mandated that procedural fairness and an adequate opportunity to state one’s case are essential elements of fundamental justice.

Equality Rights (Section 15): The Charter prohibits discrimination based on factors such as race, national origin, or immigration status. This ensures that immigration policies and procedures applied to individuals in Canada do not unjustly disadvantage them.

The case of Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia, 1989 CanLII 2 (SCC), [1989] 1 SCR 143 is foundational in defining discrimination under Section 15 of the Charter. Mark David Andrews, a British subject and permanent resident of Canada, challenged the requirement of Canadian citizenship for admission to the British Columbia bar. The Supreme Court of Canada held that the citizenship requirement infringed the rights guaranteed by Section 15(1) of the Charter and was not justified under Section 1. The Court established that legislation barring individuals from employment opportunities based solely on citizenship, without regard to qualifications, constitutes discrimination. This case is pivotal as it set the precedent for interpreting equality rights under the Charter, emphasizing that discriminatory distinctions based on personal characteristics such as citizenship are prohibited.

Access to Justice: Those inside Canada can more readily access Canadian courts to challenge decisions or laws that may infringe upon their Charter rights. Judicial review processes allow immigration applicants to question decisions made by immigration officials.

Due Process and Fairness: The Charter mandates fair and transparent processes. For example, immigration hearings and detention reviews must adhere to principles of natural justice and procedural fairness.

Charter Protections for Immigration Applicants Outside Canada

For individuals applying from outside Canada, the Charter’s protections are more limited. The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that the Charter does not generally extend to foreign nationals outside Canada unless there is a substantial connection to Canada. This creates challenges for applicants abroad:

No Automatic Access to Charter Rights: Immigration applicants outside Canada cannot directly invoke the Charter to challenge decisions or policies unless they can demonstrate a tangible link to Canada. For example, a foreign applicant denied a visa cannot claim a breach of Section 15 (equality rights) unless they show how Canadian law or decision-making has disproportionately impacted them in a way tied to Canada.

Policy and Discretion: Immigration decisions for applicants abroad are often influenced more by statutory frameworks like the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) rather than the Charter. While policies must comply with Charter values, the rights of individuals outside Canada are not as enforceable as for those within Canada.

In Tabingo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FCA 191 (CanLII), [2015] 3 FCR 346, the Federal Court of Appeal dealt with the issue of whether foreign nationals who applied for permanent resident visas before a specific date had their applications terminated by a legislative amendment. The court held that the termination of applications under subsection 87.4(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) was automatic and did not require discretion. The court also found that the appellants, being foreign nationals outside Canada, did not have a vested right to have their applications processed under the previous provisions of the IRPA. Furthermore, the court determined that the retrospective application of subsection 87.4(1) was constitutional and did not violate sections 7 and 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This case underscores that foreign nationals outside Canada do not possess the same legal rights under the Charter, particularly in the context of immigration applications, and highlights the necessity of a substantial connection to Canada to invoke Charter protections.

Impact on Families: A notable exception is where decisions affect Canadians or residents within Canada, such as when the denial of a visa application for a family member impacts the Charter rights of their Canadian relative. In such cases, courts may scrutinize decisions more closely.

Conclusion

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms establishes vital protections for individuals in Canada, including immigration applicants, ensuring their rights are upheld within the legal framework. However, its application varies significantly based on an individual’s location. Physical presence in Canada automatically activates Charter protections, granting broader access to courts and legal systems. This enables applicants within Canada to seek judicial review and directly challenge immigration decisions. In contrast, the Charter’s influence for those outside Canada is indirect and limited, often requiring a connection to Canadian interests or citizens to be invoked. Applicants abroad face practical barriers, such as limited access to Canadian legal remedies, even when they have compelling cases, underscoring the importance of physical presence in accessing the full spectrum of Charter protections. 

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms stands as a cornerstone of Canada’s legal and societal framework, embodying the nation’s commitment to upholding individual rights and freedoms. While it faces challenges and criticisms, the Charter remains a vital instrument for promoting justice, equality, and democracy in Canada. Its evolution and interpretation continue to shape the country’s legal landscape, reflecting the dynamic and diverse nature of Canadian society. As Canadians navigate complex social and political issues, the Charter serves as a guiding light, ensuring that the values of freedom and respect are upheld for all.

Frequently Asked Questions

• What is the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a fundamental part of the Constitution Act, 1982, enshrining the rights and freedoms of individuals in Canada.

• When was the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms established?

The Charter was established on April 17, 1982, as part of the Constitution Act.

• What rights are protected under the Charter?

The Charter protects fundamental rights, including freedom of expression, legal rights, equality rights, democratic rights, and mobility rights.

• Does the Charter apply to immigration applicants?

Yes, the Charter applies differently to immigration applicants based on whether they are inside or outside Canada.

• What legal rights does the Charter provide for individuals in Canada?

It provides rights such as the right to life, liberty, security, protection from arbitrary detention, and fair trial guarantees.

• How does the Charter protect equality rights?

The Charter prohibits discrimination based on race, national origin, religion, sex, age, or disability.

• What role does the Supreme Court of Canada play regarding the Charter?

The Supreme Court interprets and evolves the Charter’s provisions to align with societal changes.

• Can immigration applicants outside Canada invoke the Charter?

Generally, they cannot, unless there is a substantial connection to Canada.

• How does the Charter promote cultural diversity?

The Charter recognizes and promotes Canada’s multicultural heritage.

• What are mobility rights under the Charter?

Mobility rights allow individuals to live and work anywhere in Canada.

• Does the Charter provide access to justice for immigrants in Canada?

Yes, it ensures fair processes and allows immigrants to challenge decisions in Canadian courts.

• What protections does the Charter offer for freedom of expression?

It protects individuals’ rights to communicate their thoughts and ideas without undue government interference.

• Why is the Charter considered a cornerstone of Canadian democracy?

The Charter defines the relationship between the state and citizens, ensuring justice, equality, and democratic freedoms.

• What is the Constitution Act, 1982?

The Constitution Act, 1982, includes the Charter and marks Canada’s legal independence from Britain.

• What is procedural fairness under the Charter?

Procedural fairness ensures transparent and just processes in legal and administrative decisions.

• How does the Charter impact immigration laws?

It influences immigration laws to ensure they align with fundamental rights and freedoms.

• Why is physical presence in Canada important for Charter protections?

Physical presence activates broader access to Charter rights and legal remedies.

• How does the Charter balance individual and collective rights?

The Charter ensures individual freedoms while promoting societal harmony and equality.

• How does the Charter remain relevant in changing times?

The Supreme Court’s dynamic interpretation allows the Charter to adapt to contemporary societal issues.

Consult with Vancouver Lawyers and Immigration Consultants

https://www.instagram.com/paxlawcorp/#