Reasonableness: A Key Standard in Judicial Review Applications in Federal Court

In Canadian administrative law, the concept of reasonableness is a cornerstone of judicial review. It sets the standard by which courts evaluate decisions made by administrative bodies, ensuring they are justifiable, transparent, and intelligible without replacing the decision-maker’s authority. What is Reasonableness? Reasonableness is a deferential standard of review applied Read more…

Federal Court Seasonal Recess: Impacts on Judicial Reviews and Ongoing Delays

The Federal Court of Canada plays a pivotal role in adjudicating legal disputes, including immigration matters, administrative decisions, and other judicial reviews. However, like many judicial systems around the world, the Federal Court observes a seasonal recess, which significantly impacts the timelines for ongoing cases and judicial reviews. Understanding the Read more…

The Impact of Redacted GCMS Notes on Judicial Review: Balancing Transparency and Confidentiality in Immigration Cases

In the realm of immigration law, Global Case Management System (GCMS) notes are pivotal documents that provide a detailed account of an immigration officer’s decision-making process. These notes are often used in judicial review cases as evidence to understand the rationale behind certain decisions. However, the practice of redacting sections Read more…

Call Us Now
WhatsApp