Filing a judicial review for a refused visa application in Canada is a legal process where you ask the Federal Court to review a decision made by an immigration officer or tribunal. Here’s a breakdown of the steps involved and the chances of success: 🔹 Steps to File a Judicial Read more…
Introduction The case concerns a judicial review application under s. 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) by Abdulaziz Al Fares, his wife, and their son, challenging a decision by a Migration Officer (Officer) that denied their application for permanent residence in Canada. The officer found their claims Read more…
Analysis of Trends in Visa Refusals and Judicial Review Decisions 1. Introduction Visa refusals and their subsequent judicial reviews have followed a discernible pattern over the years. Analyzing case law from 2012 to 2024 reveals common themes and evolving judicial attitudes towards procedural fairness, evidentiary standards, and the application of Read more…
Experience a seamless immigration journey with Pax Law, specializing in assisting those refused Canadian visas, study permits, or work permits. Our team of dedicated lawyers and Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant excel in navigating complex cases, offering tailored solutions to appeal decisions or pursue judicial review. Start your immigration process on Read more…
Explore the landmark Shafei v. Canada case, 2025 FC 147, as it reshapes refugee law, balancing credibility, security, and individual rights.
The Federal Court’s recent decision in Theresa Radha Deochan v. The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration sheds light on the complexities of refugee protection and its cessation under Canadian law. This case, which revolves around the applicant’s repeated trips to her country of origin, emphasizes the critical importance of adhering Read more…
The Federal Court of Canada plays a crucial role in the country’s judicial system, but many people may not fully understand its purpose and functions. This guide aims to provide an accessible overview of the Federal Court, its jurisdiction, and how it differs from other courts in Canada. What Is Read more…
In Canadian administrative law, the concept of reasonableness is a cornerstone of judicial review. It sets the standard by which courts evaluate decisions made by administrative bodies, ensuring they are justifiable, transparent, and intelligible without replacing the decision-maker’s authority. What is Reasonableness? Reasonableness is a deferential standard of review applied Read more…
When applying for a judicial review against a decision made by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC), applicants may encounter a settlement offer presented by the Department of Justice (DOJ). A settlement offer is essentially a proposal from the DOJ to resolve the judicial review application without proceeding to a Read more…